Different regions require different approaches. One great lesson of the Marshall Plan is that it was designed specifically to meet the critical needs of a particular place during a particular moment in history. It worked because Europeans were uniquely able to make it work. People need to find modern ways of solving current problems. We need to mention also that Americans and others tried to replant NATO in other types of soil during the fifties and sixties. I don't think those approaches worked very well. This is another reason to be cautious today.
American Book Company, Pintozzi, D., & Potter, J., (2003). Passing the Ohio graduation test in social studies. New York: American Book Company, Inc
Athanassapoulou, E., (1999). Turkey: Anglo American security interests, 1945-1952: the first enlargement of NATO. New York: Routledge
Bostdorff, D., M. (2008). Proclaiming the Truman Doctrine: the cold war call to arms. Texas: Texas A&M University press.
Brower, D., R. (2006). The world in the twentieth century: from empires to nations. New Jersey: Person/Prentice Hall.
Duiker, W., & Spielvogel, J., (2008). World History, Volume 1-2. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Lacey, M., J. (1991). The Truman Presidency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lorence, J., L, (1993). Enduring voices: From 1865. Massachusetts: D. C. Health
Malberger, J., W. (2000). From obstruction to modernization. The transformation of senate conservatism, 1938-1952. Pennsylvania: Susquehanna University Press.
McCullough, D. (2003). Truman. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Smith, J. & Davis, S. (2005). The A to Z of the cold war. Maryland; Scarecrow press.
Thotex E., Emsworth L & Wick K. (2005). US history. Ohio: IOSS, LLC